Georgia O’Keeffe. Abstraction Blue. 1927. Oil on canvas, 40 1/4 × 30" (102.1 × 76 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Acquired through the Helen Acheson Bequest. © 2022 Georgia O’Keeffe Museum/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York
Alfred Stieglitz. Georgia O’Keeffe, Prospect Mountain, Lake George. 1927

Alfred Stieglitz. Georgia O’Keeffe, Prospect Mountain, Lake George. 1927

Over the course of a career that spanned the better part of the 20th century, Georgia O’Keeffe forged a distinctive visual language that managed to be both acutely observational and radically abstract. By 1927, the year O’Keeffe turned 40 and painted Abstraction Blue, she had already become one of the most prominent American artists of her day—a position all the more noteworthy for a woman artist at a time when women in the United States had only recently been given the right to vote. Abstraction Blue made its public debut the following year in an exhibition of O’Keeffe’s work at the Intimate Gallery—a small space, as the name implied, in a building on the corner of Park Avenue and 59th Street in New York. Testifying to the exceptional attention O’Keeffe commanded, a review in Time magazine focused as much on the particulars of the artist—her outfit, her expression, her command of the space—as on the details of the 41 paintings that were presented:

There were some paintings hung on the walls of a tiny room...other paintings, smaller ones, rested on cabinets or stood along the floor. The room was full of people, talking to each other in awed, foolish whispers. In the corner of the room sat a lady dressed in a black cloth coat, smiling like a severe Mona Lisa. She was Georgia O’Keeffe; the paintings on the wall belonged to her because she had made them; for some reason, the room seemed hers as well.1

Abstraction Blue (or White Line—Blue Abstraction, as the artist wrote on the back of the painting) [right] was one of only three canvases in the exhibition with nonreferential titles.2 In a cool palette ranging from icy gray to sea green, lilac to navy, Abstraction Blue presents a central bulblike form surrounded by a series of nested folds. Each layer is modulated through the smooth application of oil to achieve a distinct volume, with deep hues feathered into lighter ones to lend rounded depth to each curve. Meanwhile, a tapered white wedge slices vertically through this organic cluster, bisecting the composition and introducing a visual stutter where forms would otherwise align. The gray half-oval on the right of the divide, for example, dips lower than its aqua counterpart on the left, just enough to meet, instead, the blue-black form swooping toward it.

Georgia O’Keeffe. Abstraction Blue. 1927

Georgia O’Keeffe. Abstraction Blue. 1927

Georgia O’Keeffe. Radiator Building—Night, New York. 1927

Georgia O’Keeffe. Radiator Building—Night, New York. 1927

Of the other paintings that were included in the exhibition, 35 have titles that identify their subjects, such as Radiator Building—Night, New York [left] and Black Iris. The titles of the three remaining works that were featured, including Abstraction White Rose, temper their descriptive designation with the word “abstraction,” as if to suggest that the work at once depicts the thing named and transcends that classification toward some larger compositional end. But, lacking any mention of a subject that might link it to the observed world, Abstraction Blue—along with Abstraction White and Black Abstraction, both of which were captured in an installation shot of the show—suggests a more complete submission to pure form.

In this way, Abstraction Blue poses a question: Does the painting, as its botanical likeness and proximity to contemporaneous canvases suggests, depict a flower? Or, as its title implies, is it a purely abstract arrangement? For O’Keeffe, the difference between the two was not as clear-cut as it proved to be for many of her critics and audiences. “It is surprising to me how many people separate the objective from the abstract,” she later reflected, declaring,

Objective painting is not good painting unless it is good in the abstract sense. A hill or tree cannot make a good painting just because it is a hill or a tree. It is lines and colors put together so that they say something. For me that is the very basis of painting. The abstraction is often the most definite form for the intangible thing in myself that I can only clarify in paint.3

The artist’s work, however, was not always interpreted with such nuance—partly because of O’Keeffe’s position as a woman artist in the first decades of the 20th century, and especially at this juncture in her career. Her choice to offer “lines and colors” or something closer to “a hill or tree” had outsize consequences for the reception of her work, and she became aware enough of them to negotiate her approach accordingly, even as she managed to prioritize her ultimate goal of finding “definite form” for “intangible things.”

Read more about Georgia O’Keeffe, Abstraction Blue, and more works by the artist in the full book, Georgia O’Keeffe: Abstraction Blue, part of MoMA’s One on One series.

  1. “Art: On View,” Time, February 20, 1928, 21–22; reprinted in Barbara Buhler Lynes, O’Keeffe, Stieglitz, and the Critics, 1916–1929 (Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1989), 283.

  2. This inscription is indicated in the Abiquiu Notebooks, a personal inventory of O’Keeffe’s work the artist compiled with the help of Doris Bry. Per Lynes, Georgia O’Keeffe: Catalogue Raisonné (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art; Abiquiu, NM: The Georgia O’Keeffe Foundation, 1999), 1:329.

  3. O’Keeffe, Georgia O’Keeffe (New York: Viking Press, 1976), n.p.