Richard Misrach. Hawk and Dog. 1972. Gelatin silver print, 8 3/4 × 10 5/8" (22.3 × 27 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Acquired through the generosity of Kristy and Robert Harteveldt. © 2022 Richard Misrach

In the early 1970s, artist Richard Misrach walked every day down Telegraph Avenue in Berkeley, California, to get from his home to his job in the photography studio at the student center of the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC). Struggling to find meaning in his own work as a young photographer—Misrach had just learned the medium at the ASUC studio a few years earlier—he was suddenly struck by a realization that he could turn his camera at the post-flower-child counterculture of his own neighborhood. “This is what’s going on,” he later reflected. “Why am I not photographing it?” Rather than sneaking pictures with a handheld camera, Misrach wanted to allow his sitters to be part of the process. He asked each person for permission to make their portrait and used a Hasselblad camera set on a tripod, a slower and more formal approach that enabled his subjects to pose and confront his lens. Over three years, from 1972 to ’74, he dedicated himself to this body of work, which culminated in the publication of his first book, Telegraph 3 A.M. The book and a selection of prints from the series—the entirety of which is held in MoMA’s collection—are currently on view in Gallery 419: Living for the City. Richard recently spoke to me about his memories of this tumultuous time, and his impressions as he looks back now, 50 years after he started the project.
—Lucy Gallun, Associate Curator, Department of Photography

My name is Richard Misrach. I’m 72 years old. I’ve been photographing for pretty much a half century at this point, which simply amazes me.

I went to school at Berkeley between 1967 and 1971. On campus I had discovered a place called the ASUC Studio. This was where students could go and use darkroom labs, ceramics facilities, and lithography and etching equipment. I discovered photography there. I was 18 or 19 and I fell in love. I had this epiphany: oh my God, this language of photography speaks to me in a way I had never experienced before.

At that time, there were huge political upheavals. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. Berkeley was the first place where the big anti–Vietnam War protests were being held. There was a lot of civil rights–movement activity when I was in the dorms as a freshman. There was a project called Operation Silent Majority; I was the head of a program where we went to different communities, other colleges, and made people aware of what was going on in Vietnam. At the same time, I was learning about Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, and the great f/64 landscape photographers who resided on the West Coast. And the two—politics and photography—were just fighting each other inside me.

At first, even though I was involved politically on the campus scene, my photography was really about the landscape. Then something happened. I lived about five blocks from campus and would walk down Telegraph Avenue, which led right up to the Berkeley campus, go to work, and then I’d walk back. I was very intimidated by the people panhandling on the streets. You couldn’t avoid them. The Telegraph Avenue scene started in the 1960s with the flower children. And then it became the hippie scene, which got a little more intense. When I got there in the 1970s, it had shifted and became the street people scene. The love-your-neighbor thing gave way to heavy drugs like heroin and opioids that just threw a lot of these kids into chaos.

Richard Misrach. Dakini and friend. 1972

Richard Misrach. Dakini and friend. 1972

Richard Misrach. My camera turned back on me. 1972–74

Richard Misrach. My camera turned back on me. 1972–74

Walking past them made me so uncomfortable that I wrote about it in my journals. And then one night I had this vivid dream of taking my camera, setting up on a tripod, photographing these faces that were haunting me every day. It was a strange, vivid moment of feeling like this is what I was supposed to do.

One of the things that was really clear is I did not want to go onto the street with a 35-millimeter camera and “steal” people’s pictures. I knew that there was a lot of suspicion of photojournalists. And I thought if I go there with a big camera over my shoulder, where I’m clearly not hiding, and set it up and ask their permission to photograph them, they might find it interesting. To my surprise, it worked. I would photograph them, go down the street to the lab where I worked to develop and process the film and make prints, and come back and give them prints. And they loved it. Once someone asked to turn the camera back at me, and that’s how I ended up with my own portrait on one of the contact sheets. And suddenly I went from being the outsider to being part of the scene.

There were a number of regulars on the Avenue during those two years. Frankie had her dog, Jeremy. I photographed her many, many times. She was almost like the street mom. She was out of it a lot, but she was lovely. She was wonderful.

Julia was out there every day. She was a poet and had a distinct limp. She wore a weird black cape and a yellow hat and blew bubbles all day. She was called the Bubble Lady. And she became the symbol of Telegraph Avenue.

Moe’s Books was central to the scene. It had great art books, and a bunch of the people I photographed crashed upstairs on the floor. Moe’s is still the main bookstore of the Telegraph Avenue community. People’s Park is still a site of political activity, even 50 years later. Back then, the university was trying to take it over to build housing. Today, unhoused people live there and they’re still battling with the university to keep it for people living on the street.

Even though the people in the photos are looking at the camera lens and they’re kind of looking at me, they’re also confronting the viewer. A spectator is looking at the print on the wall at MoMA or in a book, and those people on the street are actually staring back at them. It passes through the photographer to them. In every portrait in Telegraph 3 A.M. there’s eye contact. I made lots of pictures where the subject is looking away. None of them made the final cut.

Richard Misrach. Frankie. 1972–74

Richard Misrach. Frankie. 1972–74

Richard Misrach. Steve. 1972

Richard Misrach. Steve. 1972

At that time, a question that I was struggling with—this is one of those big questions for any kind of work along these lines—does the artist have a vested interest in things being bad so that they can make great pictures that can go up on the walls of The Museum of Modern Art? I was really struggling with that and I didn’t want to use these kids that became friends. I felt a need to protect them. And they trusted me and they wanted me to photograph them, which is so interesting now. So it’s complicated. Photographs record history in a way that no other medium can. And yet there are ethical questions about how that’s done and there’s not a clean, easy answer.

After a while, I pulled away from these pictures and stopped showing them. But now, 50 years later, I look at them and think, that’s what photography does. It records a historical moment. And this is valuable, but not for the reasons I had originally intended. It’s not going to change the subjects’ lives, but it does show us what people looked like, what they were wearing. You can feel attitudes. There’s a lot of important information in the pictures. And I’m really glad now that I did it.

I didn’t go to art school; I mostly learned photography by looking at books. I would go to the Berkeley Public Library and check out books by Paul Strand, Minor White, and Ansel Adams. So the book was really important to my education. Early on there was a publisher called Scrimshaw Press that expressed an interest in publishing Telegraph 3 A.M. They published some beautiful books, but they decided that mine was too heavy of a book, so they cancelled it.

Roger Minick, who also worked at the ASUC studio, was really supportive. He was a great mentor. At the studio, we had brown butcher paper that we wrapped things in. We called it the “studio stationary.” So we took that paper and cut it to different sizes, made pages out of it, then stuck our photographs on those pages and created a book dummy. Then we played with the flow of images, the sequencing. I would show early versions of the book to Roger and other people at the studio and they’d give me feedback on the editing. And at one point I thought I had a book. I thought it was really good. But Roger told me, “You’re not done yet.” I was heartbroken. I’d been photographing for a year and a half, every day, working really hard, thousands of exposures, and I thought I was done. I decided to check out the Avenue at night, to see if I could make some pictures. I only came up with maybe eight night pictures in the end. But they transformed the project.

I read James Joyce’s Ulysses, which starts in the morning and takes place over a 24-hour period. I took that model and applied it to Telegraph 3 A.M. So the first photograph you see is the street in the morning, and the last one is the street at night, suggesting a 24-hour cycle.

When Telegraph 3 A.M. came out, I was a ripe old 24. One day, at home, I got a call from [the Magnum photographer and curator] Cornell Capa. At first I thought it was a friend of mine playing a joke on me. Capa wanted to do a show of my work with Roger Minick’s at the International Center for Photography in New York, which had just opened. Back then, I didn’t want to spend money on flying, so I drove cross country for my opening. The National Endowment for the Arts also gave me a grant for $1,500 and I lived for a year and a half on that. It was big for me, not just the money but the recognition. So these things were happening, but I no longer saw the people living on the street. And I did a lot of soul searching and felt torn. I felt like I had to decide whether to do social documentary work or to pursue photography for the love of the medium.

Richard Misrach. Julia. 1974

Richard Misrach. Julia. 1974

Richard Misrach. Telegraph 3 A.M. printing notes. 1972

Richard Misrach. Telegraph 3 A.M. printing notes. 1972

I decided not to photograph people anymore and went off into the desert. I took my new language of working at night, which I learned by photographing Telegraph 3 A.M., and I would photograph all night in cactus-strewn deserts in the American Southwest, and light up the desert with a strobe. I rejected my past and where I’d been coming from, and really dove into the aesthetics of the medium. I loved photography so much. It’s such a powerful and remarkable medium.

But over the years, especially after I had my son, I started thinking about the environment and how photography is such a potent force. I started photographing on Bravo 20, a bombing range near the nuclear test site in Nevada. So over the years, I’ve gone back and forth from turning the camera toward social and political issues, while in other bodies of work I was interested in exploring the language and beauty of the medium. Sometimes they come closer together, but often there’s one extreme or the other. And that has been the challenge and battle that’s shaped my work over all these years.

Since just before the pandemic, I’ve been doing all the art for a new mental health clinic [the UCSF Nancy Friend Pritzker Psychiatric Building] that’s being built in San Francisco. Interestingly, when I started Telegraph 3 A.M., I was working at Napa State Mental Hospital. I was a psychology major and I worked with two kids there. One of the kids was a musician and he inspired me to do the work that I’m now doing for the hospital. It doesn’t look anything like Telegraph 3 A.M., but it goes back to that moment for me.

Often over the last 50 years, I’ve gone into the desert, traveled in my Volkswagen camper, kind of chasing the light. But for Telegraph 3 A.M. and the work I’m doing now for the UCSF hospital, I’m not traveling. I’m doing it in my backyard. When you have the camera on a tripod, the world happens right in front of you.