HonestAds.org (Harriett Levin Balkind)
From the curators: The connection between political systems and truth is—across the globe—shaky at best, and quite often simply nonexistent. Politicians and their strategists are masters of spin, stretching and contorting facts, ideas, and memories about matters of all kinds, from public policy to campaign promises to personal peccadilloes. While “white lies” are quotidian in all walks of life, political lies are pernicious, especially given a recent Nielsen study suggesting consumer trust in advertising is actually on the rise. Not only do political lies undermine the public trust in government—and in the relevance and agency of the democratic process itself—they also have a literal cost: around 75% of campaign money in the U.S. is spent on political advertising. Those with the deepest pockets can shout the loudest. The ensuing cacophony often includes false statements, smear tactics, and lies that stick long enough to cause significant damage at the ballot box. Enter HonestAds.org, a nonpartisan platform designed by brand strategy consultant Harriett Balkind. HonestAds.org intends to ignite a conversation about the prevalence of disinformation across the political spectrum, and to galvanize voters into demanding more transparent and truthful publicity from politicians. Balkind has spent her career working in strategic marketing communications; her rationale is that if truth-in-advertising laws mean you can’t lie in order to sell toilet paper, then you shouldn’t be able to lie to voters.
Most ads lie. But there are Big Lies and Little Lies. A Big Lie is a claim so subjective or inherently unprovable—like, for instance, “This beer will make you a babe-magnet”—that, no matter how ludicrous, is not legally actionable.
On the other hand, Little Lies are objective claims that can be proven true or not—like, “This beer will make you lose weight”—and they could land you in court.
But there’s one kind of advertising where even Little Lies can be told with impunity, and that’s in a candidate’s political advertising. Under the First Amendment, candidates can tell the most deceptive whoppers—i.e., “My opponent dumped rat poison into the beer you’re drinking.”—and, while they may or may not receive public opprobrium, it’s perfectly legal.
“Laws protecting consumers from false advertising of products are enforced pretty vigorously,” Factcheck.org writes. But political candidates “can legally lie about almost anything they want. In fact, the Federal Communications Act even requires broadcasters who run candidate ads to show them uncensored, even if the broadcasters believe their content to be offensive or false.”
Political groups, as opposed to individual candidates, don’t carry such a get-out-of-court-free card. But that may be changing. The Supreme Court recently ruled unanimously that the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List has standing to challenge a state law in Ohio prohibiting false statements about political candidates (a law Justice Anthony Scalia mocked as coming from the “Ministry of Truth”).
The usual ways to counter lying political ads help only around the edges. You can sue for defamation, for instance, but by the time a suit winds its way through the legal system, the lying candidate may have already won election—and re-election.
Political fact-checking sites and newspaper blogs, like Factcheck.org and The Washington Post’s “Fact Checker,” are proliferating and have been the prime way to call out the lies. The sites have mixed results. On occasion, if a lying ad generates enough bad publicity, it could be pulled; just as often, the fact-checked findings are quoted in the lied-about party’s ads—where they may be used to further distort reality.
But a new group, HonestAds.org, is trying a completely different tack: it targets the political consultants, ad agencies, directors, actors, and writers who make the truth-torturing ads in the first place.
“HonestAds is a group of pissed off, tuned in citizens who refuse to be lied to by politicians any longer,” its website reads. “We’re not out to change laws. We’re out to change the way politicians make ads and, in turn, change our political culture for the better.”
HonestAds founder Harriett Balkind, who has worked in brand strategy and communications, says she hopes to “appeal to the advertising and media community in such a way that they will get on board with this. There are lots of reasons they should want to.” For one, “It’s becoming more difficult to attract young talent and one reason is because of their desire for ‘truth, justice, and authenticity,’” she says, referring to findings from a McCann Worldgroup study.
HonestAds’ debut video makes that point. In Candid Camera–like fashion, they got a real actress to do the voiceover for a fake candidate; a fake political consultant instructs her to tweak the copy until it becomes outright false. The actress, clearly disgusted, tells him, “I know the studio time is very expensive…but I’m not OK with not telling the truth.”
That is, she refused to lie even though it would have cost her a paying gig.
If—and it’s a big if—HonestAds can gain momentum, it could trigger a refreshing rebellion among the more conscious descendants of Mad Men.
October 23, 2014, 1:41 am
100 little lies– that is one reason why 55% of American adults are OBESE– and another 20% are just very overweight. One big lie will be uncovered; many smaller ones will weigh us down.
October 23, 2014, 1:43 am
100 little ones that build up and weigh us down.
October 23, 2014, 9:36 pm
100 little lies……….they propagate and permeate. The damage is irreversible.
October 24, 2014, 12:37 am
Naomi C. Hample
Book Store Owner
This is extremely important and beautifully executed. I will talk about this whenever possible and direct people to this site. But I know I will be speaking mainly to like-minded people. I would like to know that this can be directed toward those people who aren’t particularly aware of the pervasiveness and danger of these ads.
November 30, 2014, 8:43 pm
It’s interesting how with words, the entire perception of an ad changes. Of course there are laws giving us certain rights as consumers when buying products, but it also gives ad makers certain privileges in which they take 120% use of. The ultimate questions though comes to down to who gives the meaning to these words? Is it the consumers or is it the ad makers, politicians,etc? One amazing author William Luntz, wrote an essay called Weasel Words, in which he shows words that don’t hold any weight, but are used in the advertising world to sell things- all with little lies. For example the word “help” can change the entire meaning of something. Help in reality means to aid or assist, but consumers purchase things when advertisements use the world help because they think of immediate elimination of their problem. “Helps keep you looking young” is something a lot of cosmetic ad’s use, with the obvious intention of selling their products, but the people actually buying these products think they will get instant relief of their old-age. Help in this advertisement and many others just means to aid, assist, or accommodate. Who actually puts the meaning of instant relief? The consumers? The advertisements?
It seems the only solution is to open the eyes of the consumer and have them realize exactly what they are buying into, regardless of what the laws limit us to, it is us the consumers that need to be come aware.
July 17, 2015, 9:58 am
La bonne qualité des 373 Orange Hommes Trainers
I love what you guys tend to be up too. Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my personal blogroll.
September 15, 2015, 8:24 am
Sammenlign Priser Nike Dame Air Zoom Volt Sort Hvid Reflektere Sølv Løb
Currently it seems like Expression Engine is the best blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?
February 26, 2017, 11:49 am
"Great Blogpost! Hello Admin! Thanks for this article, very good information, I will be_ forwarding this to some friends, if you’re ok with that. Greetings from Germany!" https://structuringtechniques.wordpress.com/2017/02/14/for-our-dutch-readers-interview-with-a-colleague-from-europe-regarding-easy-structuring-techniques-article-in-dutch-language/
“Great Blogpost! Hello mates, nice post and good arguments commented here, I am in fact_ enjoying by these.”
February 26, 2017, 1:50 pm
"Great Blogpost! I couldn’t refrain from commenting. _Perfectly written!" https://structuringtechniques.wordpress.com/2017/02/14/for-our-dutch-readers-interview-with-a-colleague-from-europe-regarding-easy-structuring-techniques-article-in-dutch-language/
“Great Blogpost! Hello there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok. I’m definitely enjoying_ your blog and look forward to new posts.”
April 15, 2017, 12:51 pm
That is the very best search system in the planet http://google.com
This is the awesome wonderful search engine in the world