Since 1939, when The Museum of Modern Art was first able to commission a
building of its own, the goal of the institution has been not only to provide
functional space, but to express its "understanding of modern art in concrete
form." At this critical juncture, the role of architecture is seen as
fundamental as the Museum reorients its focus from the accomplishments of this
century to its goals for the next.
Nearly forty years ago, in 1959, the Museum opened a special exhibition titled
Toward the "New" Museum of Modern Art in an effort to raise funds for its
fourth Expansion. This would eventually include the renovation of the existing
lobby, the addition of the east wing and garden wing, and the enlargement of
The Abby Aldrich Rockefeller Sculpture Garden. The exhibition consisted of a
sampling of some of the Museum's greatest artworks, hung in a densely packed
installation that dramatized the need for greater space in which to display and
care for the growing collection. The installation also underscored how space
constraints affected the Museum's primary purpose, which, according to its
founding director Alfred H. Barr, Jr., was "to help people enjoy, understand,
and use the visual arts of our time."
As we now approach not only a new decade but a new century, the Museum faces unique
challenges in presenting the arts of our time. The Museum must meet these
challenges while remaining attuned to dual considerations: the need for
additional space for the growing collection, as well as the quality of that
space. Twice in the past the Museum relied on Trustees to design its buildings:
Philip L. Goodwin and Philip Johnson. Goodwin (with Edward Durell Stone)
designed the first building, and Johnson designed all but one of its subsequent
additions. For the current Expansion, which includes the site of the Dorset
hotel, the Museum invited ten architects from all over the world to participate
in a charette, a problem-solving design exercise. The goal of the charette,
as described in the brief distributed to the architects, was to produce a
variety of proposals for discussion. "The essence of the design exercise will
be the exploration of basic urbanistic and conceptual strategies for the
redevelopment of the entire Museum."
In keeping with the conceptual nature of the exercise, the architects were
asked to use a sketchbook or similar format to convey their ideas. Recognizing
the diversity of contemporary practice, however, the architects were given
considerable latitude in their submissions, provided that they could fit them
into an 11-by-17-inch box given to each participant. The physical issues
suggested by the Museum for consideration were the organization of public and
private spaces, the existing zoning restrictions, and an outlined architectural
program that included street-level uses, below-ground uses, and adjacencies. In
addition, there were four specific elements of the original 1939 building that
the architects were asked to retain: the large film theater (Titus 1), the open
stairway connecting the second-and third-floor painting and sculpture
galleries, the Goodwin and Stone facade, and the sculpture garden.
The results of this charette are presented in the center of the Philip
Johnson Gallery with examples of other work by the three finalistsHerzog
& de Meuron, Yoshio Taniguchi, and Bernard Tschumi. The finalists, chosen
by the Museum's Architect Selection Committee, will participate in a more
detailed architectural competition later this year. The charette submissions
are varied; the ten participants have given diverse responses to the site, with
some architects treating it as a linear problem and others finding more
vertical solutions to an expanded site that is nearly 600 feet long with a
total bulk of 644,000 square feet. In dealing with the architectural history of
the Museum complex (Goodwin and Stone, Johnson, Cesar Pelli), many wanted to
preserve the history of the Museum by retaining the individuality of each
building, while others created uniform facades and building heights.
Several proposals created a through-street scheme connecting 53rd and 54th
streets. Over half the entries proposed some alteration to The Abby Aldrich
Rockefeller Sculpture Garden by introducing a major architectural feature such
as a connecting bridge, a roof, or relocation of the garden in its present
configuration to a new area within the site.
The title of the present exhibition recalls not only that of the Museum's
earlier exhibition, but the title of Le Corbusier's 1923 modernist manifesto,
Towards a New Architecture, which introduced avant-garde architecture to a wide
public. In selecting the ten participating architects, the Museum has sought to
encourage new visions of architecture of our times by addressing its physical
needs. As an illustration of the Museum's ongoing commitment to the exploration
of ideas for a new Museum of Modern Art, the conceptual charette studies are
seen here against examples of earlier architectural proposals for the Museum.
Together, they suggest myriad strategies for the reinvention and
reinterpretation of the modern past as we approach the next century.
Terence Riley, Chief Curator, Department of Architecture and Design
Matilda McQuaid, Associate Curator, Department of Architecture and Design