Dominique Perrault (Paris, France)

Born in Clermont-Ferrand, France, 1953
Education: École Supérieure des Beaux-Arts, 1978; École Supérieure des Ponts et Chaussée, Paris, 1979; École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 1980
Selected projects: Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, 1989­95; Ecole Supérieure, Marne-la-Vallée, France, 1984­87; Olympic Velodrome, Berlin, Germany (under construction)







The work presented results from the quest for several architectural solutions. It is not simply a catalogue of projects; following analysis of a given context, our diagnosis...clearly identifies the elements to be protected, and those to be created. The former constitute the system's common core; the latter reveal the Museum's future evolution and metamorphoses. These variations on a single theme form the basis of our architectural responses.

Our design approach eschews aesthetic bias and calls for the intellectual participation of all. Flexibility, interactivity, and an open mind put quality at the heart of the architectural work.

A priori reflections as to what a great modern art museum of today "ought to be," though doubtless interesting, seem to me to be of the order of a purely intellectual pleasure....The "reality principle" is the bedrock on which the idea of the new Museum will emerge, and not vice versa.

All our work is based on a pragmatic approach to working with what exists in the context without preconceived notion. The new MoMA will germinate, emerge, and acquire conviction on the basis of its true situation; far from rejecting its past, the Museum will assimilate its novel geography, constituting both a pole of identity within the neighborhood, and a landmark for the city of New York.

What are the positive aspects of the existing situation? The range and quality of the Museum's collection, the MoMA team's commitment to the communication and conservation of modern art, a 1930s facade, and a garden—all facets of the genius loci.

What are its negative elements? Uncomfortable, ill-adapted workplaces; cramped, inflexible exhibition spaces; and above all the absence of natural lighting and a lack of visual or physical relations with the Museum's urban surroundings.

Perrault 2 Initial analysis reveals differences in character and function between 53rd and 54th streets. The former is predominantly pedestrian, with public or private access to the Museum and proximity to a branch of the New York Public Library, the Museum design store, and other activities in the vicinity. The latter is primarily a thoroughfare furnishing access to service vehicles, but more importantly is the site of a patch of nature, the garden. The opposition constitutes MoMA's specific identity within the city street (53rd Street) and garden (54th Street).

This ambivalence sums up the whole history of MoMA; its specific geography forms the basis of our design solutions. The resulting diagnosis privileges two avenues of development: extension of the Goodwin and Stone front, in order to create a homogeneous street front and highlight Cesar Pelli's soaring tower; extension of the garden in two directions toward Fifth Avenue and on the site of the Dorset Hotel.

This reading clarifies the urban situation by dividing the block lengthwise into two distinct parts—built facade overlooking 53rd Street; open facade overlooking 54th Street. And yet one cannot speak of a "front" and a "back"; rather, there is a street Museum front, and a garden Museum front.

The public or private entrances, like so many addresses along a street, punctuate 53rd Street while preserving the beautiful main entrance, which guarantees direct visual access to the garden. The idea of further access on 54th, via part of the garden, is in no way incompatible with this. Our transversal configuration "opens up" the Museum to the life of the neighborhood. The stroller, attracted by the "open space" of the garden, will be able to enter the Museum without having to walk around it.

The entrances situated on either side lead into MoMA itself, whose organizational structure can be compared to that of a tree. It extends into the ground as if in search of "life force"; an elongated main body forms a sturdy "trunk"; while its "branches" and foliage extend "aside," "along," or "above." To crown it all, Pelli's tower soars skyward in concert with its neighbors.

Whatever these roots and branches, the trunk is our initial concern. It constitutes the heart of the project. Architectural and functional analyses of the existing building show that the exhibition spaces are not in their "rightful" place.

By installing the library and conservation departments on floors currently given over to the exhibitions we optimize the existing building, both functionally and in terms of the quality of its workplaces. Extended office spaces occupy the top of the building and are lit naturally. Our clarification puts "things" back in place without requiring costly restructuring—we privilege efficiency, quality, and economy of means.

Extension of the garden hall throughout the length and height of the edifice creates a living space bathed in natural light, furnishing access to all levels via a system of vertical and horizontal distributions. This artery constitutes MoMA's spinal cord.

Perrault 1 The garden hall becomes a promenade within the Museum. Leading directly off to the entrance halls, overlooking the garden throughout its length, and bringing light to the Titus theaters and the temporary exhibition gallery below, this ambulatory space intersects with the library and reading room at the second level, brings the public into contact with the departments, and leads into the Museum's treasure—the collection galleries....

Thus the "trunk"—the beating heart of MoMA—is constituted without causing major disruptions, and develops and amplifies the morphology of the existing building. From there, three possible configurations are imagined for the Museum's exhibition spaces: aside, along, and above.

Aside
In the "tradition" of MoMA's extensions to date, this variant constructs a new building termed "large gallery" on an adjacent site earmarked for this.

A structure overlooking 54th Street, equivalent in volume to that of the garden (void equals solid), sits above the temporary gallery. Accessible from both streets, a vast entrance hall leads off to all the functions open to the public. A flooring system consisting of freely organized plateaux constitutes the Museum's museographic spaces. Carefully filtered and modulated natural light penetrates to the inner recesses of the building. This translucent glass case makes for a considerable degree of flexibility in its organization. One might even envisage sliding floors or partitions, allowing for easy modulation of the exhibition spaces.

The garden front, visible from Fifth Avenue, forms a grand window onto the city, in particular the skyscraper group culminating in Philip Johnson's AT&T Building.

Along
This tribute to the modern movement takes the form of an elongated block running the whole length of the existing building. Especially noteworthy are the precise geometrical relations between vertical (the Pelli tower) and horizontal (the low-rise block itself). The length of the garden on 54th Street is equal to the height of the tower.... The global morphology of MoMA can be thought of as a musical stave, a series of parallel lines punctuated with various events (or "notes"). The first of these lines is the trunk or common core along 53rd Street, as previously described; the second is the garden hall, a vast promenade bathed in natural light; the third is the horizontal line of collection galleries and their peristyle, or colonnade, which in turn liberates a fourth line, the garden, running the whole length of the Museum on 54th Street.

The temporary exhibition spaces are deployed beneath the garden, alongside the "theaters" and their common foyer....The space divides up into several exhibition spaces, from the "cabinet" to a vast plateau for works that are "monumental," whether in size or in significance.

We thus imagine a "line of light"—a translucent structure filtering direct natural light by day, which becomes opalescent when artificially lit at night. Careful geometrical treatment confers a large degree of architectural unity on the Museum as a whole.

The tower no longer overwhelms the Museum, but rather crowns it in the manner of a campanile, highlighting the purity of the building, the generous dimensions of the garden, and the soaring tower....

Above
Our search for possible architectural developments of the exhibition galleries from the common core or trunk led us to envisage a third possibility, that of a hanging extension.

This technically more intricate variant liberates generous open spaces (garden and garden hall) and protected spaces (temporary exhibition and collection galleries): an inhabited roof floating above the garden covers the existing building; a large roof resembling a thin foil or leaf federates the various buildings in the manner of a shelter—a mythical "first dwelling" protecting the human group and its culture against a hostile world; a spacious, well-lit roof that lets in light and water at given points and thus enables the garden to "breathe" naturally; a roof caught between earth and sky that borders 54th Street without walling it off or shutting out light; a roof crowns the 53rd Street group of buildings, forming an attic story of freestanding glass; a roof whose breadth affords diverse possibilities of development so as to adapt to the management and growth of the collections; a roof within which the museographic promenade is free and flexible; a roof that hallmarks MoMA's identity as a cultural institution open to the public at large; a roof reflecting the sensibility and vision of modern art as an "installation," conferring "another" meaning on the site and effecting a metamorphosis, perhaps even a transfiguration; a roof conferring identity on the site while preserving the diversity of its component parts, in the manner of de Tocqueville's conception of democracy; a roof suggesting an architecture freed from the constraints of gravity—a "certain idea" of immateriality.




Project Credits
Dominique Perrault; Aude Perrault, Gabriel Choukroun, Maxime Gasperini, Gaëlle Lauriot-Prevost, Anne Kaplan, Guy Morisseau, Georges Fessy, Didier Ghislain.


These works have been selected from a larger collection of drawings that were submitted for the charette. In addition, the architect's statement has been abbreviated.



Menu Participating Architects Toward the New MoMA


©2004 The Museum of Modern Art, New York